en ee :
were ram t rower “vr rr i rer. 4
PRAPM TAP COMPPECTION NE NAVAL PECOPRONS
Sak Se. SRSA Penn. Suer 0
7Oi S. COURTHOUSE ROA eee OO
04-2490
ARLINGTON, VA 222
This is is in reference to your application for correction of
your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
a 2
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 December 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
a
Board. Document ary material considered by the Board consiste
of your I ith all
support 2 1t
regulati aoc a the
report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation
" oard ERB), dated 23 September 2014, a copy of which is
d
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable materi
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substanti
concurred with the comments contained in the report of the
except to acknowledge that you provided a letter from the
reporting senior dated 4 April 2014, in which he said you
received no adverse counseling during the reporting period in
question, that no such counseling was warranted, and that it was
i
0
c
re
,
=
a
C
oO
Kh
his opinio
period. Ac g
names and votes SE
upon request
that
3
a.
5
Q *
i
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important Lo keep in mind thai a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O’NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5583 14
B three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying fora correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5361 14_Redacted
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 8 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case Eile. After careful and conscientious consideration of the enti record, the Board determined the letter from the Depart Veterans Affairs stating you are being treated for s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12921 14
FO. Finally, the medical documentation you provided does not negate the diagnoses of your depressive disorder, history of drug abuse, or ADHD. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10596 14
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “MRO [Marine reported on] being assigned to the BCP [Body Composition Program] “ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014 Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14_Redacted
Although your application was not filed in a time Board found it in the interest of justice to wai limitations and consider your application on its three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. After consulting with legal counsel, you lected to present your case to an administrative discharge board — (0 94...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6429 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9787 14
Further, the Board particularly noted that you ing senior have provided nothing showing that either the reporti or the reviewing officer has acknowledged that the two-tiered evaluation system, to which you and the statement dated 1 May — a he all ee 2014 from Captain i -, USMC refer, was applied in preparing your fitness report. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board - prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9956 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2932 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRICCTION Or KAVA ROCeCRDS 7ors, COURTHOUSE FOoAeU, SUI 1@a7 te ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 st No: 2932-14 31 October 2014 This is in reference to your applica tien of your naval record pursuant + t of the United ae 4 V6 tates Code, section 15 Although your application was Board found it in the interes limitations and consider your thy ember panel of the Boa é session, he names 4 a) (D m ct © QO O Q aM 2 Ge Cc BK {T i 4 Q) LS) Ce...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6934 14
TET Rem OTR NT , lu cin i DIP Ar PIVILIN ! A e Board for Correction of Naval Records, considered your application on sitti 19 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.